In 1944, the Battelle Souvenir Institute, a non-profit design in Columbus, Ohio, contracted with Carlson to hone his new process. Over the next five years, the guild conducted experiments to develop the process of electrophotography. In 1947, Haloid Corporation (a insignificant New York-based producer and seller of photographic scrap) approached Battelle to gain a license to develop and peddle a copying machine based on this technology.
Haloid felt that the parley \"electrophotography\" was too complicated and did not be undergoing good recall value. After consulting a professor of weighty language at Ohio State of affairs University, Haloid and Carlson changed the christen of the process to \"xerography,\" which was derived from Greek words that meant \"dry penmanship.\" Haloid called the new copier machines \"Xerox Machines\" and, in 1948, the term \"Xerox\" was trademarked. Haloid ultimately changed its name to Xerox Corporation.
In 1949, Xerox Corporation introduced the gold medal xerographic copier called the Likeness A.[1] Xerox became so well-known that, in North America, photocopying came to be widely known as \"xeroxing.\" Xerox has actively fought to hamper \"Xerox\" from suitable a genericized trademark. While the tete-�-tete \"Xerox\" has appeared in some dictionaries as a synonym for photocopying, Xerox Corporation typically requests that such entries be modified, and that people not use the phrase \"Xerox\" in this way. Some languages list hybrid terms, such as the very much used Polish interval kserokopia (\"xerocopy\"), equable though relatively few photocopiers are of the Xerox marque.
In the near the start 1950s, Radio Corporation of America (RCA) introduced a altering on the process called Electrofax, whereby images are formed straight away on specially coated report and rendered with a toner dispersed in a shining.
During the 1960s and from one end to the other the 1980s, Savin Corporation developed and sold a word of liquid-toner copiers that implemented a technology based on patents held by the retinue.
Previously to to the widespread adoption of xerographic copiers, photo-unswerving copies produced by machines such as Kodak\'s Verifax were against. A primary obstacle associated with the pre-xerographic copying technologies was the lofty cost of supplies: a Verifax stamp required supplies costing USD $0.15 in 1969, while a Xerox stamp could be made for USD $0.03 including journal and labor. At that in good time, Thermofax photocopying machines in libraries could publish letter-sized copies for USD $0.25 or more (at a then when the minimum wage for a US tradesman was USD $1.65).
Xerographic copier manufacturers took sway of a high perceived-value of the 1960s and premature 1970s, and marketed speech that was \"specially designed\" for xerographic crop. By the end of the 1970s, paper producers made xerographic \"runability\" one of the requirements for most of their role paper brands. Some devices sold as photocopiers bear replaced the drum-based technique with inkjet or transmission film technology.
